1. Please choose the category that best describes you: (select one)   Response Percent Response Total     Technical Assistance Provider (TAP) - i.e., SBAP, P2, MEP, SBDC, extension, etc. 22.6% 24     Federal Government (not TAP) 10.4% 11     State Government (not TAP) 31.1% 33     Local Government (not TAP) 8.5% 9     Business/Industry 11.3% 12     Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) 2.8% 3     Academia (not TAP) 3.8% 4     Consultant, Vendor, Trade Group, etc. 2.8% 3     Other (please specify) 6.6% 7 Total Respondents   106 (skipped this question)   0

2. How often do you use the Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR)?   Response Percent Response Total     Daily 0% 0     Weekly 33.3% 4     Quarterly 16.7% 2     Once a year 16.7% 2     First time user 33.3% 4 Total Respondents   12 (skipped this question)   94

3. How long have you been involved with environmental issues at your business?   Response Percent Response Total     Less than 2 years 16.7% 2     2 to 5 years 0% 0     More than 5 years 83.3% 10     Do not work in environmental area 0% 0 Total Respondents   12 (skipped this question)   94

4. How often do you use the Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR)?   Response Percent Response Total     Daily 3.3% 3     Weekly 22.8% 21     Quarterly 38% 35     Once a year 12% 11     First time user 23.9% 22 Total Respondents   92 (skipped this question)   14

5. How long have you been working in the environmental field?   Response Percent Response Total     Less than 2 years 7.6% 7     2 to 5 years 12% 11     More than 5 years 79.3% 73     Do not work in environmental area 1.1% 1 Total Respondents   92 (skipped this question)   14

6. How did you find out about the Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR)? (check all that apply)   Response Percent Response Total   Search Engine (Google, Yahoo, Alta Vista, Lycos, etc.)   0% 0   Link from another web site 9.1% 1   E-mail message or list serve 45.5% 5   Trade show or conference 9.1% 1   Brochure or newsletter 9.1% 1   Vendor   0% 0   Colleague 18.2% 2   Government assistance provider 36.4% 4   Other (please specify) 9.1% 1 Total Respondents   11 (skipped this question)   95

7. Where do you usually get Pollution Prevention (P2) or waste reduction information? (check all that apply)   Response Percent Response Total   Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR) 63.6% 7   P2Rx 9.1% 1   EPA Website 72.7% 8   General internet search 45.5% 5   Internal files 18.2% 2   Vendor 18.2% 2   Colleague 27.3% 3   News/press 9.1% 1   Training   0% 0   Other EPA sites 9.1% 1   Don't use P2 or waste reduction information   0% 0   Other (please specify) 36.4% 4 Total Respondents   11 (skipped this question)   95

8. How did you find out about the Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR)? (check all that apply)   Response Percent Response Total   Search Engine (Google, Yahoo, Alta Vista, Lycos, etc.) 8.9% 8   Link from another web site 8.9% 8   E-mail message or list serve 30% 27   Brochure or newsletter 14.4% 13   Colleague 50% 45   Other (please specify) 16.7% 15 Total Respondents   90 (skipped this question)   16

9. Where do you usually get Pollution Prevention (P2) or waste reduction information? (check all that apply)   Response Percent Response Total   Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable (GLRPPR) 56.7% 51   P2Rx 34.4% 31   EPA Website 73.3% 66   General internet search 64.4% 58   Internal files 25.6% 23   Colleague 51.1% 46   News/press 24.4% 22   Training 30% 27   Other EPA sites 28.9% 26   Don't use P2 or waste reduction information 1.1% 1   Other (please specify) 18.9% 17 Total Respondents   90 (skipped this question)   16

10. How often do you use the materials or information you receive from GLRPPR for the following actions? Yearly or less Monthly Weekly Daily Never used, might use Never used, won't use Response Average Perform a self-assessment for P2 36% (4) 18% (2) 9% (1) 0% (0) 27% (3) 9% (1) 2.91 Contact a vendor or other service provider 18% (2) 9% (1) 9% (1) 9% (1) 55% (6) 0% (0) 3.73 Contact a P2 professional for assistance 45% (5) 9% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 45% (5) 0% (0) 2.91 Write a grant application 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 9% (1) 64% (7) 27% (3) 5.18 Assist my own organization in its pollution prevention activities 18% (2) 18% (2) 55% (6) 0% (0) 9% (1) 0% (0) 2.64 Learn more about an issue 9% (1) 36% (4) 27% (3) 0% (0) 27% (3) 0% (0) 3.00 Achieve compliance through reduction of pollution generation 18% (2) 18% (2) 18% (2) 9% (1) 36% (4) 0% (0) 3.27 Total Respondents   11 (skipped this question)   95

11. Other (please specify)  Total Respondents   2 (skipped this question)   104

12. How often do you use the materials or information you receive from GLRPPR for the following actions? Yearly or less Monthly Weekly Daily Never used, might use Never used, won't use N/A Response Average Contact a vendor or other service provider 26% (22) 10% (9) 3% (3) 1% (1) 30% (26) 3% (3) 26% (22) 3.14 Write a grant application 28% (24) 6% (5) 0% (0) 1% (1) 30% (26) 12% (10) 23% (20) 3.45 Assist my own organization in its pollution prevention activities 28% (24) 23% (20) 7% (6) 7% (6) 21% (18) 1% (1) 13% (11) 2.69 Learn more about an issue 28% (24) 33% (28) 12% (10) 6% (5) 13% (11) 0% (0) 9% (8) 2.37 Contact another P2 professional to collaborate 26% (22) 22% (19) 9% (8) 1% (1) 22% (19) 6% (5) 14% (12) 2.88 Contribute P2 materials to GLRPPR 28% (24) 8% (7) 3% (3) 2% (2) 40% (34) 6% (5) 13% (11) 3.40 Provide information to a client 21% (18) 19% (16) 12% (10) 3% (3) 22% (19) 7% (6) 16% (14) 3.10 Assist a client with reducing or preventing pollution 17% (15) 23% (20) 12% (10) 5% (4) 19% (16) 6% (5) 19% (16) 3.01 Help a client achieve compliance through reduction of pollution generation 22% (19) 20% (17) 8% (7) 3% (3) 16% (14) 7% (6) 23% (20) 2.91 Total Respondents   86 (skipped this question)   20

13. Other (please specify)  Total Respondents   5 (skipped this question)   101

14. How would you rate the glrppr.org website on: Excellent Good Fair Poor No opinion Response Average Ease of use 18% (17) 54% (51) 14% (13) 0% (0) 15% (14) 2.40 Navigation 14% (13) 53% (50) 16% (15) 2% (2) 16% (15) 2.54 Search function 20% (19) 41% (39) 13% (12) 0% (0) 26% (25) 2.72 Visual design 9% (9) 45% (43) 15% (14) 13% (12) 18% (17) 2.84 Currency of information 22% (21) 46% (44) 4% (4) 0% (0) 28% (27) 2.67 Accuracy of information 28% (27) 40% (38) 6% (6) 0% (0) 26% (25) 2.56 Total Respondents   95 (skipped this question)   11

15. How useful are our resources for your needs? Very useful Useful Somewhat useful Not useful N/A Response Average Topic Hubs - peer reviewed P2 information on specific industries and topics 27% (23) 42% (36) 12% (10) 2% (2) 17% (15) 1.87 P2 Programs Directory - compilation of national and regional P2 assistance programs 24% (21) 41% (35) 16% (14) 1% (1) 17% (15) 1.93 News - regional and national P2 news 27% (23) 41% (35) 16% (14) 1% (1) 15% (13) 1.90 Homes Across America - database of resource-efficient home builders and demonstration homes 7% (6) 23% (20) 17% (15) 10% (9) 42% (36) 2.54 Mercury Reduction Programs Directory - database of programs across the country working to reduce mercury 12% (10) 33% (28) 23% (20) 3% (3) 29% (25) 2.26 RFP Database - clearinghouse of RFPs (requests for proposals) 7% (6) 30% (26) 15% (13) 6% (5) 42% (36) 2.34 Library - digital library of P2 publications 22% (19) 41% (35) 10% (9) 2% (2) 24% (21) 1.91 Total Respondents   86 (skipped this question)   20

16. Do you have any comments or suggestions about our resources?  Total Respondents   12 (skipped this question)   94

17. How useful are our services for your needs? Very useful Useful Somewhat useful Not useful N/A Response Average Listserves - online discussion groups on P2 topics 15% (13) 41% (35) 18% (15) 5% (4) 21% (18) 2.15 Regional Roundtables - meetings of regional P2 professionals 22% (19) 29% (25) 19% (16) 1% (1) 28% (24) 1.98 Rapid Response - research or technical assistance, including personal answers to specific questions 18% (15) 38% (32) 12% (10) 5% (4) 28% (24) 2.05 Regional Programs and Contacts Database 18% (15) 45% (38) 22% (19) 0% (0) 15% (13) 2.06 Calendar of Regional Events 14% (12) 51% (43) 19% (16) 1% (1) 15% (13) 2.08 Total Respondents   85 (skipped this question)   21

18. How useful to you are the following types of P2 information? Very useful Useful Somewhat useful Not useful N/A Response Average Case studies 39% (33) 39% (33) 14% (12) 1% (1) 7% (6) 1.76 Fact sheets 44% (37) 41% (35) 9% (8) 0% (0) 6% (5) 1.64 Manuals 20% (17) 49% (42) 18% (15) 4% (3) 9% (8) 2.05 Background and overview about topics and P2 opportunities 18% (15) 54% (46) 21% (18) 1% (1) 6% (5) 2.06 Personal responses to specific questions 28% (24) 31% (26) 19% (16)